Dun dun DUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!
wELL FOLKS, IT’S FINALLY HAPPENED, HOLD ON, TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES . .
There, that’s better.
Well Folks, it’s finally happened, there’s no feature for today! Cue panic (quick, everybody start looting!).
I have been in a period of transition lately–reorganizing this blog, finishing up projects, and starting new projects–so I haven’t given WTOE its due attention this week. Sorry for that, funny thing is some of the reorganization and changes (coming to you live on Monday) have to do with WTOE! Anyway, today I will be rounding out my thoughts on art a little better and writing on some of my favorite artists and what their work has meant to me.
Art has the potential to do so much. It can literally change people and society. To me, the definitions of art and artist are wide ranging. By my definition, an artist is anyone who has a view of the world and/or humanity, or an idea, which he or she intentionally attempts to manifest in some way. Art is the manifestation of a person’s view or idea. When you really think about those definitions, well, they have the potential to make people angry. For example, wouldn’t that make Karl Rove an artist of sorts? Yes. Who ever said that all art is good, or that what comes from art is always good? Art has the potential to affect people, to sway how they think and feel–sometimes that is not a good thing. Art can be abused (music industry *cough*). I think the short story–Wasted Past, Unwashed Future–by Rarasaur illustrates this point really well. I also have to point out that my definitions simultaneously make art everything, and thus nothing. What can I say? Maybe I don’t like delineating certain aspects of creation as art (essentially relegating them to the realm of Ramen-eating perpetually broke hippies), and other things as more constructive forms of creation (which are then separated from the idea of being art). Maybe I’d rather see the word “art” disappear and be replaced by a true understanding of the act of creating something–whether that something takes the form of words, equations, theories, songs, paintings, bridges, buildings, and so on.
I’ve brought up Karl Rove because what we call art, like the digital age, has the potential to either heal our wounds or to tear their edges further apart. We live in an age of instant information (well, some of us do). This has created a pandemic of verbal
diarrhea. It has created a generation of lazy thinkers who would rather have meaning handed to them on a silver platter rather than have to look for it. Knowledge given is not the same as knowledge earned, and there is a frightening trend growing in the U.S. education system (I can’t speak for other countries) that relies heavily on rote memorization and test-taking skills. I can’t claim to know what the path to wisdom is lined with, but I’m willing to bet it isn’t scantron sheets . . .
And that is why art is both important and scary. Rove and his ugly band of cohorts ran away with my country, turned us into bullies, made us complicit in unspeakable actions around the world. They painted a very ugly picture. How? By understanding the worst aspects of human nature and exploiting them. It is easier to exploit people who accept things at face value. We need deep thinkers. More than that, we need visionaries that look at the world and see its potential to be better, not its potential to be exploited. We need better artists.
That is why I feel understanding the driving forces behind creation and why people do things (to put it simply) is so important. It’s not a whim, it’s an essential aspect of creating a better world. We have to understand our past and present before we can overcome it–and we shall either overcome the past or be consumed by it.
And now that I’ve gotten that out, I’d like to share with you some of my favorite artists and why they are so important to me. But first, if you have any thoughts on the above, please share in the comments section below. Argue with me for
‘s sake!
All right, now I’m actually going to share some of my favorite artists with you:
1. The White Stripes: My junior year of high school was ending when I discovered the White Stripes. I lost a friend to a drunk driver (and repeat offender sheltered by his connections). It was an odd situation. I didn’t trust easily, I had very few friends and only one that I spent a lot of time with. This is not the person I lost. I’m not sure that anyone else really knew we were friends. The majority of conversations I had with him always seemed to happen when it was just the two of us, after school. Despite our interaction being limited throughout the years we knew each other, he came to mean a lot to me. When he died, I felt like I had no one to talk to about it because it was hard to explain to others why I felt so devastated. I wasn’t sure how I was going to get through this experience on my own. One day I cam across the White Stripe’s album “Elephant.” The album is dedicated to the death of the sweetheart. While I know this is a figurative ideal more than a literal meaning, it became a shoulder to lean on when I needed one. Every song on that album seemed to be telling me to hold on, we’ll get through this. You, me, and the world at large. So I held on, and I got through, and I still love the White Stripes today. The full dedication to the album is stunning, and I highly recommend you read it: you can find it here. Click on the second image in the second row.
2. Matt Parker and Trey Stone: Three words: America,
YEAH! Lol! Anyway, these guys blend wisdom and fart jokes into one potent martini. While I don’t always agree with their ideas, or the summation of the show, I have mad respect for their work and the overarching message to question the world around you. If something is ridiculous, point it out. Make a joke of it, especially if it is already a joke by its very nature. Most importantly, however, South Park taught me how to laugh at things I took far to seriously. It taught me to question myself (in a good way) and be willing to laugh at my own absurdities.
3. Umair Haque: Remember when I said we need visionaries? Umair Haque is one of those visionaries. Whether it is the incredibly thought-provoking posts on the HBR (Harvard Business Review) Blog Network, or his book Betterness: Economics for Humans (which puts forth the stunning idea that profit as the bottom line is not a good thing for our world or ourselves), Haque always delivers thought-provoking content with the assertion that a better future is out there. His writing gives me hope, makes me think, and inspires me to be a better person. Betterness is available on the Kindle–buy it, read it, love it! Well, okay, feel however you want to feel about it so long as you read it.
4. Albert Einstein: I don’t think I need to explain this one. It’s pretty self-explanatory.
5. Ray Bradbury: There are really no words to describe what his writing has meant to me. The best I can say is that it is like sitting and chatting with a dear friend: comforting, thought-provoking, and lovely.
There are a lot more I could add to this list, but I’m stopping myself at five. Who would you put on your list and why?
Also, please don’t forget to yell at me for calling Karl Rove an artist!
Oh yeah, and send me your arts–whatever form they may take–to ponderingspawned at gmail dot com. Answer this question (and this is the most important part): What drives you to create?
Related Links:
Ten Years of Shock and Awe (I linked to this above as well when I spoke about Karl Rove. This is an amazing, detailed, and well researched article that is well worth the read. READ IT, READ IT NOW!! Then buy Umair Haque’s book and read that too.)

Well there may be no features honey but you have still made this ‘Featureless Friday’ full of creativity, humour and love… hey why not Featureless Friday every Friday!!?? It has a nice ring to it…. MUCH better than Follow Friday on a certain social networking site….
From the emptiness – infinity is possible.
From the emptiness–infinity is possible: I like that!
I’ve never heard of follow friday, something tells me that’s a good thing . . .
Thanks for the compliment! I might consider making discussion a bigger part of the blog aspect of WTOE as the discussion is very lacking (and to me the most important part). Hmmm, methinks I have some thinking to do . . .
Although I don’t engage as much as I will in future… for obvious reasons… I do find wordpress by far the best (supportive, positive, intelligent, thoughtful etc.) of the Social Platforms.
In June I saw HH Dalai Lama and his speech/the theme for the tour was: ‘Make this a Century of Dialogue’.
Makes me tingle from head to toe.
xxhugsxx
Have you ever seen the movie “Limits of Control”? Very interesting – It explores how governments cannot control the dangerous elements of society, the writers, artists, scientists, shamans, bohemians, dancers, musicians and whatnot because they are tuned into something that is transcendent and impossible to contain.
Dude, that goes so well with the novel I’m working on right now, I have to watch that! Thanks for the suggestion! If you an find it (might be hard, maybe youtube?) I recommend watching Trance and Dance in Bali. It’s an ethnographic video about a ritual dance–really cool stuff!
Ooh, that sounds good. I’ll look for it! I love stuff like that.
I hope you like it, it’s pretty artsy and out there. It would even be fun to have a discussion group because it’s so weird.
You have to describe the book you’re working on – is it different than what I read in Wattpad? I’m waiting eagerly for the rest of the basement games story – shudder!
It is quite a bit different than secrets and stew, though I can see some major similarities between what I’m working on now and Electric Tango and Wandering Minstrel. Actually, come to think of it, it also deals with some of the subject matter of Secrets and Stew too! It’s a scifi book, future dystopia kind of thing. I want it to be similar enough in setting to Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 to invite comparison and also offer commentary on those books (and others, and society, and people, and all of that).
That is the end of the story for Secrets and Stew. Part of why I shared it is because I wasn’t sure the meaning was coming through (which is a fancy way of saying no one seems to understand it but me, lol, obviously I need to do some rewriting!) I think I’ve identified some key areas to make changes to which will make it easier for the reader to catch what is happening in the story. That’s part of why I’m sharing my work, I have a tendency to assume people will get something (because it makes sense in my head), but not leave enough clues in the actual writing for readers to follow. I’m aiming to have the rewrite up next week, keep a lookout for Secrets and Stew, Take Two!
I am putting up a new segment to my blog (inspired by Rara’s mad hatters tea party, not sure if she still does that) where I’ll be inviting discussion from anyone on anything–it would be cool if you shared about The Limits of Control! I’ll watch it sometime soon, but feel free to discuss even if I haven’t seen it yet!
. . . Can you tell by the lengthy nature of my response that I’m (supposed to be) writing??? LOL!
Pingback: I’m a Versatile Blogger! | artisticmilestone
I’m feeling let down that Secrets and Stew is at an end. I could see it as a full length book where the boy slowly uncovers what the hell is going on in that cellar. I was correct that they were serial killer cannibals, right?
Your idea sounds cool and I would definitely participate
I’m supposed to be writing too, about Rara’s prompt for Meraki. And doing my awards and sending you my artwork. Lately, I have been the embodiment of procrastination and laziness. I feel like such an ass!
I go through periods of time where I feel that way too (sometimes it happens when I’m actually working really hard, but I take that as a sign that I’ve taken on too many projects again, lol!).
Okay, you’re the third person who has told me it should be a book, I might have to give that more thought!
You are right about his parents, they are serial killers (you’re the first person not to say vampires, vampires don’t eat stew or go out in the daytime, so I’m not sure where people are getting that one from . . .).
SPOILER ALERT!!!
I’m going to explain the meaning, so don’t read any further if you want to wait for the rewrite first: The dad is a psychologist in the city, he and his wife prey on patients of his that have no family by inviting them home after their release and then killing and eating them. These are the same patients that their son befriends, unbeknownst to them. At the end of the story they decide that on Halloween night (which is the following night) they will tell their son what they have been doing. They reach this decision because they assume he is also a sociopath, but they couldn’t be more wrong on that point as their son is actually very sensitive and caring. What I intended but have not managed to convey is a sense of dread in the reader as they realize that Jonah’s entire life is going to come crumbling down the next night as he discovers, in one go, that his parents are killers; his only friends in the world are dead at the hands of his parents; and they’ve been feeding them to him. Thus, the real horror of the store is not found in gore, or in the actions of his parents, but in Jonah’s loss of innocence.
If I can make this work, it will be an awesome short story!
How in the world did they think of vampires! I got your story and knew that the boy was good since he didn’t set the ants on fire, just the stuff around them. I think you conveyed all of that well. I don’t think that the author should be blamed because people don’t read carefully or that they bring in things with them that aren’t even in the story. It reminded me of a Dean Koontz, actually. Where the nice kid is up against terrible foes who have authority over him and he has to fend for himself. I imagined the book even having the dad invite all the kids from his class for a party and showing them a nice little basement with an elaborate train set to offset what Jonah has accidentally revealed.
Hmmm, the more you talk about it, the more I could see it as a book . . .
I really do have to give that serious thought.
What was the title of the Dean Koontz book (if you remember)?
It wasn’t a particular book. It was the flavor of it. The good against evil sort of thing he often writes about